Tuesday, December 29, 2020

Wonder Woman 1984

Reviews From the Dark Side

Wonder Woman 1984

Released 12/25/20


I think I'll start this by briefly recounting my thoughts on the first Wonder Woman film from 2017.  I liked Wonder Woman.  But, I didn't love it.  The chemistry between Gal Gadot's Diana and Chris Pine's Steve Trevor was easily one of the standouts of the movie.  They had such an ease with each other that you felt something for them as an audience.  They are one of the best onscreen duos I've seen in several years.  As for the movie itself, I thought it had its hits and misses.  There were some inconsistencies in the first act that I couldn't wrap my mind around.  I thought the pace picked up a great deal once Diana and Steve left Themyscira.  The entrance into the World War II theatre was by far my favorite section of the film.  Director Patty Jenkins shot so many great scenes of Diana in action, the best of which was her emergence from the trench facing down intense gunfire.  Then we transition to an...adequate if not spectacular third act with Diana vs. Aries and we come full circle to my first statement.  I liked the movie, but didn't love it.

That said, I can't say I was excited about the prospect of a WW sequel, but, I was enthusiastic that it would at least provide the same level of joy the first did particularly with Gadot, Pine, and Jenkins returning.  Unfortunately, I have to say WW84 fell a little short for me.  

I think the biggest issue I had was the movie just sort of sits there.  It's very standard.  It has a couple of thrills and many contrivances that don't work to advance the plot or are even necessary at all.  It's just a hodgepodge of...stuff.  Stuff flung against the wall to see what would stick.  I expected better.  Particularly since Patty Jenkins supposedly had more influence on the film outside of direction than she did in the first.  It's a very different experience from the 2017 entry.

For one thing, I'm not exactly sure what setting the movie in 1984 accomplishes.  It's not intricate to the plot in any way, shape, or form as its predecessor's setting in the 1940s was.  Other than trying to capitalize on the Stranger Things 80s nostalgia phenomenon, the timeline has no bearing on anything.  The events here could have easily taken place in 2020.  Actually, it would have made more sense for it to take place in the modern day.  Diana exhibits new abilities here that may have been useful in BvS or Justice League.  Granted it's been a minute since I've seen either movie, but, I don't recall her ability to fly or turn objects invisible in the modern day.  I'm just thinking the former might have been a nice tool in some instances.  The latter?  I don't know.  Although it did create a nostalgic Super Friends moment.  But, that's about all it did.

Another thing that made me ponder why is this a thing is the whole "secret identity" schtick that was pushed in the first 20 minutes.  Okay, I get not sticking around for accolades.  But, Diana is an insanely attractive woman using a glowing rope, wearing knee high boots and an armored bathing suit.  Plus she's operating in daylight and doesn't have the speed of the Flash.  Honey, you're going to be noticed.  And the whole taking out the cameras with the tiara looked good visually.  But, we're really supposed to think that's going to protect her secret?  I can't say I'm a surveillance expert, but, don't these security cameras usually send images to recording equipment in a back room?  Hate to say that tiara can destroy a 1,000 cameras and you'd still be on tape WW.  It's not something I was annoyed by, but, it was a silly plot point that seemed to be there "just 'cuz."

 Now on to something a little more substantive.  Steve Trevor does return.  And there is a glorious heartfelt reunion between Diana and Steve.  But, the circumstances surrounding his return are a little sketchy for me.  Not sketchy as difficult to understand, but, sketchy as "you two are kind of wrong for this?"  I'm not heartless.  Of course I understand how two lost loves would initially throw caution to the wind and become intimate.  But, it bothered me a little that the gravity of what was happening didn't at least weigh on either of them a wee bit.  Steve was back in another man's body.  Now he and Diana did want to get to the bottom of why he was back, but, it struck me as very strange that these two heroic figures seemed to have little concern over the guy Steve supplanted.  Neither had any curiosity if the subject was dead, sent to Limbo, or was still somewhere in his own body.  It seemed the writers were so intent on the Diana/Steve reunion, they never stopped to think both characters are being a tad callous and cavalier about the situation.  It actually would have been a more interesting plot point if the supplanted personality was either fighting with Steve for dominance or if he had a family that forced both of them to confront the chaos and ethic of what was happening.  This could have been played for comic or dramatic effects.  And the real kicker here is even in the end when they both know Steve can't stay, the only reason they give up the dream is so Diana can get her mojo back, not for the poor guy who had his life ripped away from him.

Let me address something I've heard on many an occasion particularly in the past couple of years in this age of social media warfare.  It's been implied that to be overly critical of the flaws in movies such as this is silly because everything about them is made up.  You should just go with the flow and enjoy.  Here's the problem with that theory.  It's a very true statement for all who are reading this that every superhero/fantasy/science fiction extravaganza you watch is the fantastical creation of the crew who made the film.  But, you also have to realize that within these creations, particularly if you're dealing with a series,  a universe within this framework is often established.  Universes that have their own set of imaginary rules.  So, when those rules are broken within that framework, there's an issue.  To switch gears for a moment, it's the reason Rey was such a controversial figure among the fandom in the recent Star Wars sequel trilogy.  WW84 has its own controversial McGuffin in the form of a magical stone that grants wishes.  One set of rules is established for how it functions.  Then when the plot demands something different, those rules seem to change haphazardly with little more explanation than it's another "just 'cuz" moment.  There appears to be a lot of these in this sequel.  This is the one aspect of the movie I found rather annoying.  

Going back to my first point, there are other aspects of WW84 that are, well, pointless for lack of a better word.  The opening flashback to Themyscira is my first example.  It was a well shot and exciting sequence to be sure.  But, what was the purpose?  A lesson of not cheating to achieve your goal was taught to the very young Diana by the end of this act.  But, what was the broader picture here?  I guess you could loosely say it was a lesson revisited because Diana unwittingly "cheated" to get Steve back but, the connection is so cryptic that it's indeed a very loose connection to what happened on Themyscira.  

You know that fancy winged golden armor you see WW wearing in many of the promos for this movie?  Can I just say that it turns out to be just a grade above Stormtrooper armor?  It serves no purpose.  It has no special capabilities outside of giving Diana a new look.  This was brought in strictly to sell new toys and collectibles.  Cheetah was tearing it apart fairly easily.  Diana really didn't need it to fight her once she got her groove back.  

Speaking of Cheetah, she and wannabe tycoon, Maxwell Lord, are the two antagonists in WW84.  Lord, played by the Mandalorian himself, Pedro Pascal, is the primary villain.  His smarmy, manic performance was possibly the highlight of the film outside of the chemistry between Gadot and Pine.  The more scenery Pascal got to chew, the more he seemed to be enjoying himself.  He was a fun character who I wish had a meatier plotline.  I think he could have done special things if his storyline had taken a turn more for the sinister than the silly.  But, again, you could see he was really enjoying himself.  As for Kristen Wiig's, Cheetah, there was nothing wrong with Wiig's performance as the feral villain.  She did what she could with the part.  But, for me she felt like a bit of an afterthought, a super powered foil for Diana to trade punches with because she could easily tear Lord apart with her bare hands if she wanted to.  I thought Wiig played the transition from unconfident nerd to arrogant sexpot to vicious monster well.  I just think she needed her own film as the primary antagonist to shine more.  The CGI left something to be desired, but, the performance did not.  Trust me there was a reason WW and Cheetah fought in a night setting.  That CGI was a little rough.  

I've gone on and on about the movie's flaws.  You might think I hated WW84.  I didn't.  But, it was a letdown.  It felt very much like a cash grab.  It feels as if the producers said we struck gold with the first film so we're golden for all future endeavors.  No Warner Brothers, you still have to put a little effort into presenting a cohesive story.  WW84 is a decent enough entry into the superhero genre if you're not looking for anything particularly noteworthy.  It doesn't really advance any narrative in the greater DC Extended Universe.  I don't know.  Is there still a DCEU?  If so, then WW84 is the equivalent to what Iron Man 3 was in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.  A somewhat entertaining throwaway film that adds very little, if anything, to the general storyline.  It's a one watch wonder.  And a very lengthy one at that.  There was no reason this movie had to take two and half hours out of your life.  One hundred minutes would have been plenty.

But, I will leave on a positive note.  The mid-credits scene?  Yes, unusual for a DCEU movie to have one.  Nice touch.

The Dark Lord of the Sith says:

*** stars

0*= Don't waste your time.  Pure dreck!  Dreck is too good for this!  Blind me, please!

1*= Fuggedaboutit!

2*= Average/Mediocre/Nothing Special

3*= Worth a look

4*= Great.  I'm doing my happy dance!

5*= Pure eye candy.  I have seen the top of the mountain, and it is good



Sunday, March 1, 2020

The Invisible Man

Reviews from the Dark Side
The Invisible Man
Released 2/28/20

A couple years ago, Universal announced they would be creating their very own cinematic universe based on the reimaging of their classic monster hits from the 1930s and 1940s.  The first was an ill-received remake of The Mummy starring Tom Cruise.  While I thought it was a strange, but, imaginative take on the Egyptian monster, most didn't and the new monster universe appeared to be scuttled before it had any wind beneath it.

That brings us to 2020.  It's not clear if Universal still has designs on a cinematic universe, but, The Invisible Man is here nonetheless.  This time Universal teamed up with those low budget horror mavens at Blumhouse to bring this classic back to life.  A team-up with Blumhouse could be hit or miss.  They've produced decent horror in the past.  But, they've also made a lot of B-movie grade trash as well.  Plus, is the concept of the Invisible Man terrifying on anything but a superficial level?  Is it a Freddy/Jason/Michael type of fear he would invoke?

Unequivocally, this reimaging is what horror should aspire to.  It's so unsettling and slowly, masterfully builds to sheer terror in a way I haven't found this satisfying in a long time.  This is the best kind of horror as it doesn't rely on jump scares or gore as much as it just messes with your noggin something fierce.

Cecelia Kass lives in abject fear of her wealthy inventor boyfriend, Adrian Griffin.  Plotting and executing a daring middle-of-the-night escape from his house/compound, she takes refuge at the home of her sister's police detective friend.  Over the next few weeks, she effectively becomes a recluse rarely daring to venture outside hoping Adrian will not find her.  Life brightens when she receives word that Adrian has committed suicide and left part of his fortune to her.  Finally free, wealthy, and optimistic for the first time in forever, Cecelia's existence has become fairly rosy since Adrian died.  Or did he?  Bizarre occurrences begin to plague Cecelia that she can't explain, but, she's certain who's behind them.  But, how can that be?  Her boyfriend is dead.  And she has a fair amount of PTSD from living under his authoritative thumb for so long.  Could Adrian have concocted a way to remain in her life or is she slowly losing her mind?

This film is beautifully directed by Leigh Whannell who knows his way around a horror movie or two writing the scripts for both Saw and Insidious.  He also previously directed the whacked pseudo-horror cyberpunk actioner, Upgrade, in 2018.  If you haven't seen that, I highly recommend.  What I like most about how this was shot was the dead silence of several scenes where the most action you see is a panoramic view of a room.  You know something is there, but, it's unseen.  And very rarely does something just jump out at you.  There are subtle clues there is a presence.  And when there is action, it's all the more terrifying because the assailant is not visible.  There are several scenes in the film that you might call a climax.  The one that particularly impressed me is a scene between Cecelia and her sister.  What happens is so quick and sudden.  And, I swear you won't see it coming especially not in the way it happens.

That brings me to the star of the movie, Elisabeth Moss.  She paints a picture from beginning to end of an abused, tormented woman who is driven to her wit's end.  And you see how her experiences change her.  Her physical acting is tremendous in this.  She convincingly has fights against an invisible foe and mimics the natural movements of those altercations.  She makes you experience the fear and confusion she feels.  It's a great performance that sells the film.

One thing many movies in general, and horror movies in particular, have difficulty with is sticking the landing on the ending.  I don't want to give too much away, but, I think audiences will find it wicked and satisfying.

The Invisible Man is a horror movie that proves the genre isn't all about blood and stabbings.  The first kill doesn't come until we're a little more than halfway through the runtime.  It's very much a psychological thriller throughout.  It's well paced, well directed, and well acted.  The atmosphere is absolutely chilling at times.  This is horror done right.  If Universal can keep churning out remakes like this, their monster universe should be a healthy one for years to come.

The Dark Lord of the Sith says:

**** stars

0*= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Worth a look.  Better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. I'm doing my happy dance!

5 *= Pure eye candy. I have seen the top of the mountain, and it is good







Tuesday, January 21, 2020

2020 the Best (and Worst) of the Rest

Dolittle- You know sometimes when you watch a movie, you can tell when a star just took the gig for a fat paycheck.  And that's exactly the sad feeling you're left with watching Robert Downey Jr. in this mediocre-at-best waste.  Downey is the legendary English doctor who has the uncanny ability to speak to animals.  The good doctor embarks on a mission with a would-be protégé and a squad of talkative, bumbling-if-well meaning animal friends to search for a cure for the ailing Queen of England.  Several comedic misadventures follow as the group follows the trail of the elusive cure all while combating a villainous mustache-twirling rival of the good doctor.  This might have been cute if the jokes weren't so lame.  Annoying bickering is what the film tries to pass off as amusement.  It rarely works.  Not one character is even remotely interesting including the title one.  The first big movie of the year is also a big dud.  Featuring the voices of Emma Thompson, Rami Malek, John Cena, Kumail Nanjiani, Octavia Spencer, Tom Holland, Craig Robinson, Ralph Fiennes, Selena Gomez, and Marion Cotillard.  Antonio Banderas and Michael Sheen co-star.
**1/2 stars


The Gentlemen- Guy Ritchie returns to his violent, comedic gangster roots in this tale of a brilliant streetwise American gangster trying to sell off his vast UK marijuana empire to retire to a quiet life with his wife/partner.  The story itself is a whirlwind of deception and double crosses which can be challenging to follow.  It's a narrative that could have spun wildly and incoherently out of control.  Somehow this tangled web has logic when the big reveals are made.  Wry humor is juxtaposed with blinding violence in a way that will keep you entertained at the very least.  The film is littered with wonderful performances, but, the standouts are Matthew McConaughey's silky smooth marijuana gangster and Charlie Hunnam's Raymond as the fixer/righthand man to McConaughey.  Both deserve much praise.  Colin Farrell, Michelle Dockery, and Hugh Grant co-star.
***1/2 stars

The Turning- This is the type of horror movie that annoys me.  No thrills, no chills, no fire whatsoever.  I'm sure the creators had something good in their heads, but, it couldn't be articulated to the big screen.  And to make matters worse, much of this film is shot in darkness so the action (what there is of it) is a bit sketchy.  And, even worse, darkness should work for most horror movies if there is something interesting happening.  There isn't.  An adaptation from an 1898 ghost story, The Turning is the story of a young teacher who is hired to become governess to a young girl who witnessed the death of her parents outside the gates of the family estate.  Life starts to get wild and wooly when the girl's brother returns unexpectedly from boarding school.  There are mysteries within the walls of this house that tell a sordid tale of the former riding instructor and previous tutor that threaten to drive the new governess mad.  Or, is she merely suffering from delusions like those that have afflicted her mentally ill mother.  The Turning feels more like a series of random events than a coherent horror story.  It's just not very good.  Mackenzie Davis and Finn Wolfhard star.
** stars


Fantasy Island- The old adage "be careful what you wish for" comes to mind as you watch this film based on the late 1970s, early 1980s TV series.  Five guests are flown to a mysterious tropical island resort maintained by the equally mysterious "Mr. Roarke" and his staff.  Here they are each allowed to live their greatest fantasy with the caveat that once a fantasy begins, it must be seen through to the end.  Little do the guests know that their fantasies are destined to take a drastic, and, in some instances, deadly turn they hadn't bargained for.  What is the secret to Roarke and his crazy island?  Will anyone survive to solve the puzzle.  The film was produced by Blumhouse so it isn't a stretch to assume the story would take a murderous bent.  However, with a PG-13 rating, it's devoid of true gore or any real scares.  It's an entertaining, if a bit mundane, stringing together of events.  The big twist of the film is very much a stretch when you consider the previous actions of that character prior to the reveal.  No one is that good.  It's very obvious Blumhouse is leaving itself open to making this a franchise if it catches on with audiences.  Let's hope if there are sequels Blumhouse will consider upping the ante to get an R rating where the envelope could be pushed a little more.  The film works as a mild throwaway suspense thriller.  I did enjoy Mr. Roarke's stark stoicism as it came from an actor who has been known to play goofy comedic characters.  Michael Pena, Maggie Q, Lucy Hale, Michael Rooker, and Portia Doubleday star.
*** stars


The Hunt- Here's a politically charged thriller/satire for the ages.  A film that proudly wears its criticisms on its sleeve.  Eleven strangers (originally twelve) wake up in a field not knowing where they are or how they came to be there.  They're provided a cache of weapons and then are systematically hunted by unknown assailants.  They're in the middle of a deadly game.  A game where the elite politically correct try to annihilate the uneducated, gun-loving unwashed masses.  But, the PC-ers may have made one critical mistake (of mistaken identity) that could turn the tables in favor of the "commoners."  The Hunt will likely make people angry on both sides of the political spectrum because it takes direct swipes at the syrupy social justice correctness on the left and intolerant conspiracy consuming rhetoric on the right.  But, it does take care to make these two extremes so over the top that the endeavor is more hilarious than cringe inducing.  Most of the death scenes are sudden and ludicrous in nature.  It's a film that's just...fun if you don't take the political leanings seriously.  So come one, come all and give it a shot whether you're a snowflake beta liberal cuck or a conservative redneck gun-loving racist.  According to this movie, neither of you leaves much to be desired.  Hilary Swank, Emma Roberts, Ethan Suplee, Glenn Howerton, and Betty Gilpin star.
***3/4 stars


Birds of Prey and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn-
I contemplated writing a longer more formal review on this film.  But, then I thought better of it because there really isn’t much to say about Birds of Prey.  Well, not much good anyway.  I wish the worst thing I could complain about was the ridiculously long and silly title.  But, let’s start.  The long and short of it is, this movie is a sequel of sorts to 2016’s Suicide Squad.  Harley Quinn, the Joker’s paramour, has literally been kicked to the curb by her “puddin’.”  Floundering aimlessly for a time, drinking heavily, and trying to enjoy a fabulous egg sandwich, our mildly psychotic protagonist attempts to stay under Gotham City’s radar.  It seems she’s angered quite a large number of people in the underworld and the fact that everyone still believes she is the Joker’s lover is the only thing keeping her alive.  That is until the fateful day when she’s finally ready to move on and “explosively” declares her independence from the Clown Prince of Crime to the world.  Big mistake because Roman Sionis, the crime boss known as Black Mask, has a bone to pick with her.  But, first, he needs her to complete a task involving a diamond that not only he, but, several others are eager to obtain.  Among those are a trio of women, Black Canary, Huntress, and GCPD detective Renee Montoya who might be friend or foe at various times given the circumstances.  Everyone is on the trail of a smalltime teen pickpocket by the name of Cassandra Cain who has possession of the diamond.  First, let me say that if you believe from the trailers sight unseen that this was a Margot Robbie vanity project that should have stayed a vague idea in someone’s head, you would be correct.  I do remember liking her rendition of Harley in S.S.  But, absence did not make the heart grow fonder and 1000 nails scraping across a chalkboard would have been less annoying than her in this film.  She was a big goof machine with little substance outside of  “let’s see what crazy thing Harley says or does this time!”  It had already grown tiresome after the first 20 minutes.  The fourth wall breaking and complete irreverence I suppose had a certain Deadpool-like quality to it, but, Ryan Reynolds carried this off with a lot more pizazz in my opinion.  Margot Robbie is better than this script.  As a matter of fact, Ewan McGregor (Black Mask) is better than this script.  The other Birds are mainly inconsequential props for most of the runtime.  The one exception could have been Huntress who has an interesting backstory.  That’s a tale with meat on the bone that I would have been interested in the movie pursuing.  But, alas, this wasn’t about Huntress’s emancipation.  And let me say this.  If you are a fan of Cassandra Cain’s “Batgirl” character from the comics, you might want to stay away from this one.  You might be ready to fight someone.  Her character in this film is nerfed as badly as Bane was in Batman and Robin.  You’ve been warned.  On the positive side, there are several well-choreographed action sequences.  I believe the fight coordinators from the John Wick franchise were used here and you can very definitely see that influence.  All this said, Birds of Prey is not a terrible movie.  I’ll use a food analogy (I use a lot of those).  It’s a bologna sandwich.  It’s edible, but, you want more than a bologna sandwich, unless you just love bologna sandwiches.  Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Rosie Perez, and Jurnee Smollett co-star.
**1/2 stars

Bloodshot
- In the ongoing war between Marvel and DC, it's easy to forget there are other comic book properties in the world.  It isn't as if an abundance of those properties have been converted to the big screen to be fair to movie fandom.  Which brings us to this release of Bloodshot, a Valiant Comics property which doesn't have much recognition outside of comic circles.  Admittedly, as much of a fan as I am of the genre, I didn't know much about the character either.  So, unlike most Marvel and DC-related adaptations, I had no clue what to expect nor did I have any preconceived notions of what I envisioned the story to be.  U.S. soldier, Ray Garrison, is murdered by a revenge-seeking enemy and is subsequently resurrected by a high tech corporation specializing in enhancing severely injured military personnel.  Bolstered by tissue regenerating nanite technology, Garrison becomes the special ops agent, Bloodshot.  But, this is a very deep rabbit hole Garrison has found himself in.  Deceptions and manipulations surround Ray's new life as he attempts to piece together the missing fragments of his current existence.  Bloodshot was a much deeper movie than I anticipated which was a refreshing change of pace than what you usually find in this genre.  Even so, you still get your standard action movie tropes.  The nanotech CGI was competent.  The story does become overly complicated at certain junctures which is what kept it from being a great movie for me.  But, it's a fairly solid one.  Vin Diesel and Guy Pearce star.
***1/2 stars

Bad Boys For Life- This third installment of the buddy cop franchise finds detectives Mike Lowery and Marcus Burnett at different crossroads in their lives.  Mike is still the hotshot super crimebuster he's always been, but, is now realizing his life is a bit empty.  Marcus is looking to leave the detective game for greener pastures particularly after the birth of his grandchild.  When a dangerous thread from Mike's past comes back into the picture, it's time for the Bad Boys to unite in their irreverent destructive way for "one last ride."  BBFL is saturated with the same mirth and mayhem as the previous installments.  So chances are very good if you liked the first two chapters, you'll enjoy this as well. I, for one, have never understood the mad love audiences have for this franchise.  It's not that I haven't enjoyed it, but, I haven't found it any more appealing than other action franchises.  It's ridiculously over the top and preposterous on every level imaginable.  The only other action franchise I can compare it to for sheer lunacy is the Fast and Furious series.  But, I suppose that's its appeal.  It does lunacy very stylishly and that makes all the difference.  For, me though, its good but I'm not in love with it.  Will Smith and Martin Lawrence star.
***1/4 stars


Bad Therapy- This black comedy adapted from a Nancy Doyne novel follows an upper middle class couple who make the fateful decision to attend marriage counseling sessions.  Unfortunately for them, their counselor, Dr. Judy Small, has a different agenda for the couple and will use unorthodox methods to execute it by any means possible.  The biggest issue I had with this film is that it's neither uproarious enough to be even mildly amusing nor dark enough to be provocative.  You're going to have a hard time understanding why the Howards are in counseling in the first place.  The wife is a bit of a nag.  The husband is a little indifferent.  The teenage child is a typical embarrassed-by-your-parents movie kid.  There could have been some life in the Dr. Small character with some tweaking.  She's definitely manipulative, but, doesn't have that sense of smoldering evil underlying the surface to make her truly menacing.  You keep watching hoping someone will at least lose an eye or something that will wake you out of your doldrum.  This isn't an awful film, but, you'll get the sense that it could have been so much more.  Alicia Silverstone, Rob Corddry, and Michaela Watkins star.
**3/4 stars

Sonic the Hedgehog- As a rule, video games don't translate very well to the big screen.  And the first trailer for Sonic several months prior left much to be desired, particularly the CGI on the title character.  But, in a rare instance of Hollywood listening to the backlash of the fandom we got a much tighter looking design and a renewed interest in the project.  I'm glad it happened because it would have been a shame had this movie not gotten off the ground.  Sega's Hedgehog with an attitude starts the film as a youngster on his own world where other anthropomorphic animals covet his power to move at supersonic speeds.  Escaping to Earth through a ring portal, Sonic spends the next 10 years in hiding living in the shed of a local Montana sheriff and longing for a friend.  One evening his frustration gets the better of him and he creates a power surge that blacks out a good portion of the Pacific Northwest landing him on the radar of the U.S. Department of Defense.  They bring in controversial scientist, Dr. Robotnik, to investigate.  When the sheriff finally discovers who is living in his shed, the two go on a wild adventure trying to evade the relentless Robotnik who desires the alien's power.  Not that Sonic ever gets too deep, but, there is some surprising character development here.  You feel his loneliness and isolation until he's befriended by the sheriff.  The relationship these two develop is actually sweet.  And Jim Carrey, undoubtedly the biggest name in this film, hearkens back to his sillier days of Ace Ventura or even The Mask as the evil Robotnik.  You haven't seen him this manic in years.  The CGI effects during Sonic's power manifestations were impressive.  This was a fun movie that gives you everything you can expect in a family friendly story.  Longtime fans of the Sega games should hang around for the mid-credit scene which is undoubtedly signaling a sequel is in the works.  Ben Schwartz voices Sonic.  James Marsden co-stars as the sheriff.
***1/2 stars


Extraction- This Netflix original isn't really a special movie unless you're a fan of two things.  Chris Hemsworth and John Wick-ish style action.  The only issue is the Wick action is very good.  The non-Wick moments will mostly have you longing to get back to the Wick moments.  There really are no compelling characters in this including the lead which I don't think is the fault of the actors themselves.  Their characters just aren't fleshed out enough for you to care very much outside of the action sequences.  Tyler Rake is a black market mercenary who is hired to retrieve the son of a powerful incarcerated drug lord who has been kidnapped by a rival drug lord.  Rake and his extraction team must fight through hordes of thugs, corrupt military, and police through Dhaka, Bangladesh to save the child.  And, hopefully not get themselves killed in the process.  Great eye candy, but, not much else to hang your hat on.
***1/4 stars

The Lovebirds- What do you need when the magic has left your relationship?  According to this Netflix feature, a good old fashioned murder might do the trick.  Julie and Eric's passion has faded after four years together.  They fight constantly.  They're on the verge of breakup.  But, fate hilariously (and fatally) steps in when they hit a bike rider with their car.  There's more to this disheveled man than meets the eye when they realize he was actually on the run from a killer who has now targeted them as well.  There's nothing terribly special about the story itself, but, it does provide consistent if not always spectacular laughs.  And there is comedic chemistry between the leads which drives the film.  Hopefully, we'll see this pairing again in the future.  Issa Rae and Kumail Nanjani star.
***1/2 stars

Becky- This is kind of a strange one.  The King of Queens in the role of a fascist neo-Nazi criminal.  Becky is the "kindly" story of a father and daughter attempting to reconnect after the tragic death of the mother/wife.  Becky, an already deeply emotional 13-year old, is none too pleased when her father announces that he is now engaged to an unwanted guest (in Becky's mind) at the family cabin in the woods.  A larger monkey wrench is added to the mix when four escaped criminals come calling in search of a mysterious key that is located somewhere in the cabin.  Now, if you were expecting some type of deep mystery into what this key means, what it opens, why the key is in that cabin, and why the criminals want it, you won't get anything more than it's important to the Aryan nation for some reason.  It's the ultimate McGuffin.  The important takeaway here is that Becky goes full psychotic Kevin McAllister on the four invaders.  And, that has entertainment value in and of itself.  So, if you're satiated by a couple of gory kills, the film has value.  But, there's not much to it outside of this.  Except maybe you have an inkling by the end that all is still not well with Becky.  But, I guess they'll save that for the sequel.  I was entertained.  Lulu Wilson, Joel McHale, and Kevin James star.
***1/2 stars


The Old Guard- Imagine.  An elite mercenary team full of Wolverines.  An unscrupulous pharmaceutical CEO who wants to unlock their secrets.  A former CIA operative who has been tracking the team's exploits for some time for his own secretive purposes.  Netflix brings Greg Rucka's comic series to life in this brutal actioner that examines immortality and the melancholy trappings that come with this "gift."  The mercenaries' immortality comes with a caveat, however, as the line in the old Guns 'N Roses song goes "nothing lasts forever."  One thing I enjoyed a great deal about this film is, although there's plenty of action and blood spatter, it never felt bombastic or put me on sensory overload as many action movies tend to do these days.  There's a story with some meaning here among the shootouts that draws you in on more than a superficial eye candy level.  And, it leaves room for a sequel.  I wouldn't mind seeing a continuation of this group's adventures.  Charlize Theron and Chiwetel Ejiofor star.
***3/4 stars

Relic- Natalie James'  directorial debut is an ambitious one, I'll give her that.  In the tradition of films like "The Babadook",  Relic takes a very real problem in our world and twists it for the purpose of fitting the horror genre.  However, also like The Babadook, this real world concept isn't really frightening on a visceral level.  And creeping you out down to your bone marrow is the mark of good horror.  Relic does offer some macabre imagery, but, not much more.  An older woman mysteriously disappears from her home for several days.  Her daughter and granddaughter travel to her home to conduct a search.  When the woman, Edna, finally reappears at her house, she seems none the worse for wear.  Physically.  Mentally, however, might be a different matter as Edna's behavior becomes stranger.  What could be the issue?  Is this a case of possession?  Or, is it a nefarious physical ailment rearing its ugly head?  The whole film is a large metaphor which I won't give away in this review.  I applaud the effort at attempting to present horror in a different manner.  The execution just wasn't there for me.  Emily Mortimer, Robyn Nevin, and Bella Heathcote star.
**1/2 stars


Fatal Affair- Welcome to the Netflix version of a Lifetime channel thriller.  Well acted to be sure.  But if you want a film with all the usual tropes of a psychotic attraction turning horribly wrong (is there any other way this can go), you've hit the mother lode.  A successful attorney semi-bored with her current family life almost (please note almost) does the unthinkable with a handsome colleague that has recently come back in her life.  Needless to say, this near-dalliance doesn't work out very well for the attorney who must now fend off the disturbed would-be paramour interjecting himself in her life at every turn.  This is a movie whose plot points you can call from minute one.  It has all the subtlety of a spinning roundhouse kick to the dome.  Fatal Affair is not so much a bad movie as it is one you've seen dozens of times.  It's a film that lacks nuance and has paint-by-the-numbers suspense.  It's a bit of near trash entertainment if you have nothing better to do.  Nia Long and Omar Epps star.
**3/4 stars


Unhinged- I don't think I've seen road rage taken to such extremes since the 1971 classic, Duel.  Unhinged is a very basic movie.  Newly divorced mother has a traffic entanglement with a stranger.  Said stranger is mentally unstable (to put it mildly) and begins stalking his "prey" relentlessly.  There is no more to the plot than what I just described.  Really no motivation for why the stranger is what he is or does what he does other than he's just psychotic.  This film would have had the opportunity to become a true cheese fest if not for one thing.  Russell Crowe plays the Hell out of the role of the deranged psycho stranger.  Seriously, he'll give you chills he's so damn evil.  He was Unhinged's saving grace and makes this very simple movie watchable.
*** stars


An American Pickle- This weird little dramedy features a unique plot.  Well, one I never heard of prior to now.  A Jewish-Russian immigrant working in an American pickle factory in 1919 accidentally falls into a vat of pickle brine as the factory is being condemned.  The brine perfectly preserves him for a century and he's revived to learn that his only living relative is his great grandson.  Eras clash in comedic and sometimes dramatic ways as the two lean on each other, then fight, come back together, then fight some more.  This is the kind of movie with its unquestioningly goofy premise that you have come to expect from its star.  And, more often than not, he usually pulls it off.  There are some genuinely hilarious moments, but, it's by no means a straight goofball comedy.  There is also some genuine pathos from both sides ping ponging from the grandfather's sense of loneliness to the grandson's feeling of inadequacy in his career.  This is a solid feature if not a spectacular one.  Seth Rogan stars in a dual role.
***1/4 stars



The New Mutants- I always had reservations about this film.  First I wasn't thrilled that Fox was turning a film about "junior X-Men" into a pseudo-horror movie.  I wasn't convinced that the studio that has given us just as many bad X-Men movies as good could pull off a concept this bonkers.  There wasn't a lot of confidence instilled when the release date was moved a number of times.  There was even speculation that the movie would never be released when Disney acquired Fox.  Why would Disney even allow this confusion when they are likely going to restructure the X-Men film mythos under Marvel Studios?  But, I guess earning some money is better than earning no money at all, and, since it was already in the can, here we are.  As much as I thought New Mutants was going to be yet another trainwreck on Fox's bipolar X-Men railroad, I have to say, it was shockingly...decent.  It's a better entry into this now defunct universe than Dark Phoenix was.  Faint praise, sure, but, it's something.  Five young mutants (Danielle Moonstar, Illyana Rasputin, Sam Guthrie, Roberto da Costa, and Rahne Sinclair) are "guests" at a mysterious hospital facility run by Dr. Cecelia Reyes.  Here Dr. Reyes attempts to train the super powered teens under the auspices of one day becoming X-Men once they've complete command of their abilities.  After the admission of Moonstar, strange things begin to happen almost immediately for the other mutants, manifestations of their worst nightmares.  Dani is the key to all even to uncovering the secrets of the hospital which may not be all it appears to be.  While I have no trouble admitting New Mutants is a better movie than I thought it would be, it is by no means a perfect movie.  There are parts of it that feel disjointed.  The characters themselves aren't particularly fascinating (outside of Illyana).  And there's a Demon Bear that's important somehow (don't ask).  But, I was mildly entertained by this one.  You'll leave the Fox X-Men franchise with a better taste in your mouth than you had with Dark Phoenix.  Faint praise once again.  But, you could do much worse.  Maisie Williams, Anya Taylor-Joy, and Alice Braga star
*** stars


Antebellum- This one's a strange amalgam.  A little bit The Village.  A little bit Hostel.  We start with a slave in the Antebellum South who suffers the usual indignities of black people of that time (branding, rape, and general disrespect as being less than a person).  Then maybe about halfway through, we see the same slave as a successful professional in the modern world.  What happened?  A time warp?  A fever dream?  Bad sushi?  You'll just need to watch to understand what's going down in this trippy feature.  Like most films that depict this time in history, parts of the narrative made me extremely angry.  But, this isn't your usual Civil War-style movie.  The transitions are a little abrupt, but, it's a well acted surreal story that does deliver on its punchline.  This was a different kind of film.  In this instance, different is good.  Janelle Monae, Jena Malone, and Gabourey Sidibe star.  
***1/2 stars


No Escape- Here's a horror film that tries to marry arguably the two greatest "torture porn" franchises in movie history, Saw and Hostel.  Starting with a theme that's truly the product of this era, a social media star famous for taking daredevil (foolish?) risks (a la Logan Paul), travels to Moscow with a group of friends to capture new content inside a radical new type of Escape Room game where the players must solve clues to move through the maze of a "Doomsday" scenario.  One-by-one his friends fall victim to the game's elaborate traps leaving him to solve the madness of the game.  Maybe I've seen too many of these films at this point in my life.  I wasn't overly fascinated watching this.  It wasn't poorly made, I've just been on this ride several times.  However, the ending is what boosts the film from being slightly better than mediocre.  Think of a famous Michael Douglas thriller with a sinister twist as you watch the ending.  The finale is some really good stuff if you like conclusions slightly on the messed up side.
***1/4 stars

Hubie Halloween- The latest collaboration between Netflix and Adam Sandler's Happy Madison production company is another screwball comedy in the same vane as most of the comedians other projects throughout his career.  Hubie DuBois is a well-meaning socially awkward deli worker in Salem, Massachusetts.   He's the subject of much ridicule and many practical jokes among the town's citizenry.  When his tormentors begin disappearing mysteriously after Hubie meets his eccentric new neighbor, Hubie in his own inimitable style begins his own investigation with the assistance of Salem's "top cop", Steve.  The fun in Hubie Halloween isn't necessarily the story itself.  It's a typical Sandler movie.  Kind of cute and sweet in its somewhat vulgar way.  For me this is nowhere near the equal of Sandler's magnum opus, Happy Gilmore.  Many of the characters are variants of other characters you've seen in Happy Madison productions.  The fun for me is a kind of "gang back together" kind of theme.  One thing you can say about Sandler is he will always give his friends and collaborators work in his movies.  I kind of like that about him.  It always appears to be a big party among Sandler and his buddies.  In addition to Sandler, a bevy of Happy Madison alums co-star (Julie Bowen, Kevin James, Rob Schneider, Steve Buscemi, Ben Stiller)  Shaquille O'Neal, Maya Rudolph, Kenan Thompson, Tim Meadows, Michael Chiklis, and June Squibb add their lunacy to the mix as well.
***1/4 stars

Ava- Ava is an action thriller that is only notable for its mundane similarity to other better action thrillers.  In fact, I'm not even sure why this film was made.  It's not horrible, but, you won't find a more standard imitation of a genre than this.  Title character, Ava, is a trained assassin who falls from grace at her secret agency for some strange reason.  She has to fight her way through setups, other assassins, and, ultimately, her boss.  Along the way, we are also introduced to her volatile, estranged sister, bedridden mother, and her sister's fiance who was formerly her lover.  And she has the pre-requisite handler/mentor who cares for her like a daughter.  Well, if your daughter was a deadly assassin.  Nothing remotely notable here.  They even end this with the possibility of a sequel.  Please don't waste anyone's time.  Jessica Chastain, John Malkovich, Colin Farrell, and Common star.
**1/2 stars

 The Owners- This quirky little thriller takes place in the English countryside.  A group of  delinquent friends think they have an easy score when they break into the home of an elderly couple.  However, when the couple arrives home unexpectedly, the would-be thieves have to improvise and hold the victims captive.  But, who really are the captives in this scenario?  This is the kind of strange low budget thriller that I think suits the horror genre very well these days.  Sure, it's not likely to scare you senseless, but, it is disturbing in its own screwball way.  This is a film in a similar vane as the 2016 classic "Don't Breathe."  It's not as good, but, entertaining in its own right.  Maisie Williams stars.
*** 1/4 stars

Superintelligence- Artificial intelligence takes a comedic turn in this wacky, but, sweet comedy.  An A.I. that has achieved sentience decides to study the most mundane human it can find to determine if people are worth saving or destroying.  Its guinea pig is a former executive-turned-milquetoast activist whose life is turned upside down by the intrusion of her newest "friend."  But, can a woman as average and unassuming as this really convince an advanced technology that humanity is really worthy of survival?  Superintelligence is the fourth collaboration between Melissa McCarthy and her husband, Ben Falcone, who serves as director and supporting character.  I said earlier it's a sweet comedy.  It hits a few humorous threads, but, like its main character, is fairly standard.  McCarthy does her best to inject her unique brand of silliness into mundane script.  What results is an adequate but safe comedy.  The very definition of "cute."  In addition to McCarthy, James Cordon stars as the intrusive and jokey A.I.  
*** stars

Freaky- Blumhouse strikes again with their latest horror comedy extravaganza, Freaky.  Basically what you have here is your common body swap movie melded with a slasher film.  A vicious serial killer switches bodies with a bullied teenager through the arcane magic of a supernatural dagger (of course).  The killer (in the teenager's body) discovers this body change thing is great as he can now go basically undetected and unsuspected on his sprees.  Meanwhile, the teenager is completely dazed and confused living in the serial killer's macabre world.  Now this could have been an interesting splicing of genres.  While the film does have its fair share of gore.  I don't think the comedy was what it could have been.  Freaky is mildly amusing, but, I feel it kind of held back pushing its utter absurdity.  It's an entertaining watch, but, one that could have been so much better.  Vince Vaughn stars.
***1/4 stars

The Stand-In- What do you do when you want to escape the trappings of your life?  You get someone else to live it for you.  After a very public meltdown, a pampered movie star becomes a sad recluse  To avoid rehab, she sends her former movie stand-in to take her place.  When the stand-in inadvertently rejuvenates the star's career, the star, who has found love online (and an unexpected talent for carpentry), wants no part of it which causes a darkly comic rift between the two women who clearly want different things out of life.  The key here is the complete reversal of roles between star and standi-in.  One turns out to be not as bad as originally presented.  The other turns from meek to master manipulator.  The film isn't as comical as I'd hoped, but, the performance by the lead actress will keep you entertained throughout.  Drew Barrymore stars in the dual role.
***1/2 stars

Fatale- Here's a film that has many narrative similarities with Fatal Attraction and one big one with an old Hitchcock thriller.  A successful sports agent has a one night stand with a woman he meets at a friend's bachelor party.  Events take place that bring the two together again in an unexpected way.  Little does the agent know how costly his dalliance was as his life is turned inside out.  Fatale is not a hard film to figure out.  You'll call out events before they happen.  But, that doesn't mean you don't have some fun getting to the destination.  Plot twists lead into bigger ones.  The film is layered with complexities, but, I think it accomplishes its goal quite nicely.  This is a solid thriller.  Michael Ealy, Hillary Swank, and Mike Colter star.  
***1/2 stars


Shadow in the Cloud-
If you're looking to take a walk on the bizarre, look no further than this pseudo-horror war film.  Set against the backdrop of World War II, a female pilot hitches a ride on a B-17 bomber carrying a mysterious box she claims to be top secret.  Treated shabbily by the all male crew, she's unceremoniously placed in the plane's lower gun turret to remain out of sight and out of the way for the journey.  And that's when things turn psychotic.  I don't want to give it away (the opening minutes kind of tell you what's to come), but, whoever dreamed this up did so on an acid trip.  Think about how much of a 180 From Dusk Til Dawn made and you'll have some inkling as to what I'm talking about.  The plot makes no sense.  It is a little heavy handed on the "girls rule, guys drool" narrative at times.  But, it's just goofy enough to be fun through one sit through.  Chloe Grace Moretz stars.
*** stars


Tenet-
This is going to be hard.  Hard because I have no idea what to tell you about the plot, the purpose, etc.  It's action packed.  It's trippier than anything director Christopher Nolan has ever done.  But therein lies the problem with Tenet.  It's so trippy.  It's convoluted to the point of being undecipherable.  Slick production to be sure, but, way too clever for its own good as far as following 
a coherent story.  I'll give it a go.  Best as I can discern, an agent from an unknown group learns to manipulate the flow of time to prevent an attack from the future that threatens to annihilate the present.  If you're saying, "Huh?", imagine sitting through it.  As visually stylish as it is, I have to give this one a big, "Nah."  John David Washington, Kenneth Branagh, and Robert Pattinson star.
*3/4 stars


Soul- This latest computer animated feature is the latest from the creative minds at Pixar.  Joe Gardner is a middle school music teacher who has big dreams of playing jazz professionally.  When he finally gets his break to play with a jazz legend, he is so elated that he inexplicably falls down an open manhole.  His soul wakes up in the Great Beyond where Joe desperately attempts to get back to his own body.  He finds an out when he becomes "mentor" to a cynical unborn soul called 22 who hasn't found a purpose for living since her/its existence.  When both land back on Earth, a series of comic misadventures may just give both what they have been looking for.  So, what else is there to say?  It's a Pixar movie, so Soul was almost automatically going to be a glossy high-quality production.  It is funny despite the subject matter.  But, what separates Pixar from most animated features is the incredible heart infused within these productions.  Soul is no different.  Some of the concepts of loss and finding your place in the world may be a little deep for younger audiences, but, they will almost certainly be appreciated by the parents of those audiences.  This is a cute movie with a lot of heart and dare I say...soul.  Featuring the voice talents of Jamie Foxx and Tina Fey.
***3/4 stars


-








  



0*= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Worth a look.  Better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. I'm doing my happy dance!
5 *= Pure eye candy. I have seen the top of the mountain, and it is good