Reviews from the Dark Side presents
American Hustle
Released 12/13/13, now in theaters
American Hustle is David O. Russell's latest comedy that reunites Bradley Cooper and Jennifer Lawrence from last year's critically acclaimed Silver Linings Playbook. In addition to Cooper and Lawrence, an all-star cast has been assembled with Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Jeremy Renner, Louis C.K., and Robert DeNiro in an uncredited role.
The usual problem with following a movie as successful and acclaimed as Silver Linings Playbook is avoiding the obligatory comparisons to your monster hit. While I didn't like American Hustle as much, it's another great effort from Russell who continues his incredible hot streak.
American Hustle is based on some true events from the 1970s. Irving Rosenfeld (Bale) is a small-time businessman and master con-artist. He meets his soulmate in former stripper and fellow con-artist, Sydney Prosser (Adams) at a party and the two soon become lovers. Of course, the affair chafes Irving's loud, shrew of a wife, Rosalyn (Lawrence). Irving, however, refuses to divorce Rosalyn for fear that she will take their son away, who Irving has adopted.
Irving and Sydney run a successful con game embezzling money from their various marks and attract the attention of FBI agent, Richie DiMaso (Cooper), who poses as one the marks to get close to the duo. In exchange for not busting them, Richie enlists their aid to take down four other con artists.
What follows is a scheme that causes the ambitious and greedy Richie to aim for the big fish in Congress who are not immune to taking bribes when Irving involves Carmine Polito (Renner), the mayor of Camden, New Jersey, in the plot. Carmine is generally a good man who is desperate to bring Las Vegas-style gambling casinos to Atlantic City adding much needed revenue to the city. Unfortunately, he hasn't been able to obtain funding. An elaborate plot involving a faux-sheik and notorious gangster, Victor Tellegio (DeNiro), ensues that threatens get Irving and Sydney violently killed if they can't figure out a way to extract themselves from all the players involved.
It's hard for a movie to go wrong with this type of cast, but it has happened. See Dead Man Down and Seven Psychopaths if you don't believe me. All of the main players in American Hustle perform admirably, but I have to say again the standout here is Lawrence. I've said that quite a few times lately. But I say it because it's true. Rosalyn has some of the best comedic scenes in the film. Honestly, this is a woman who takes credit for her husband's moment of clarity in devising a way to extract himself from the mob and FBI after her loose lips nearly get him killed.
American Hustle is a fun time if a bit overlong for my tastes. Russell does something that isn't always easy. He deftly blends comedy and drama in a way where one doesn't overshadow the other. I know I've complained about this very thing when it comes to other directors wishing they would pick a lane. Russell transitions so seamlessly, so naturally. In some directors' hands, the transition feels like speed bump.
I didn't find American Hustle quite as fun as Russell's last outing, but that's not a downgrade of the film. It would have been difficult for it to top my love of Silver Linings Playbook. But nevertheless, American Hustle is a must-see during this holiday season.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
*** 3/4 stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
Friday, December 27, 2013
47 Ronin
Reviews from the Dark Side presents
47 Ronin
Released 12/25/13, now in theaters
Japanese legend undergoes the Hollywood treatment in the Christmas release of 47 Ronin. The film is a depiction of the true story of 47 masterless Samurai (ronin) in the 18th century who took revenge for the wrongful death of their master under threat of their own demise by their government if they took action. Director, Carl Rinsch, and Universal Studios have taken the route of turning the story into a mythical fantasy which is sure to anger purists of the true legend.
Kai (Keanu Reeves) is a half-breed (part human, part mystic) who is found by the Asano clan as a boy. He's pretty much treated as a second-class citizen by all the Samurai in the clan with the exception of the clan master who took him in and the master's daughter, Mika, who secretly loves Kai.
The Asano clan has a rival in Lord Kira and his clan who secretly covets the Asano lands and power. And, he's willing to use sorcery to obtain his objective as he has obtained the services of a powerful witch. When the two clans unite for an annual ceremony for the Shogun (governor), an unfortunate event manipulated by Kira's witch forces the Shogun to order the ritual suicide of the Asano clan leader for the offense. Kira is also awarded the Asano lands and the hand of Mika's in one year (to allow the morning of her father). The Asano Samurai, now Ronin, are also ordered to vacate the lands by Kira. Kai is sold into slavery. Oishi, the master's chief lieutenant, is imprisoned by Kira to further humiliate the clan and break his spirit.
Oishi is released a year later and believed to be a broken man. However, he is far from broken. He plans to reunite the Asano Samurai to take vengeance on Kira despite the Shogun's warning a year ago that no vengeance is to be taken. He also needs to liberate Kai as he needs the half-breed's supernatural connection to combat Kira's dark forces.
I went into this movie not knowing the legend of the 47 Ronin. Maybe that's a good thing as I had no preconceived notion of what the story was supposed to be. I admit that I'm a bit of a purist when it comes to characters or stories that I know. The film does make several embellishments on the legend. For example, I'm not completely up on my Japanese history, but I'll take a stab in the dark that dragons and mystical witches didn't exist in 18th century feudal Japan. I'm thinking the liberties that were taken is in part the reason critics have taken a machete to it. But, now knowing the story, I still enjoyed the special effects and embellishments.
That brings me to issue two of why this film has been panned. And, that would be Keanu himself. Come on, now. Insert your Keanu joke here. You know you have one. We all do. And, I'll admit some of those jokes are well earned. But, I also think the actor gets a bit of a bad rap at times. He can be decent, or, at least serviceable in roles that call for an average set of dramatic skills. While I think it would probably be a mistake to cast him in a remake of Raging Bull, he's fine for a role such as this.
I was impressed by the fantasy elements added to the story. It's a fascinating study of loyalty and duty as the 47 Ronin know they face imminent death whether they succeed or fail in their mission. But, honor is paramount in the bushido code and the warriors face their fate with dignity.
47 Ronin won't go down as one my favorite movies of all time, but, I'll be a lone voice in the woods and say it's worth a look. Hurry though. If you want to see it on the big screen, I wouldn't wait too long. Considering the backlash the film is receiving it might be on DVD within the week.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
***1/2 stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
47 Ronin
Released 12/25/13, now in theaters
Japanese legend undergoes the Hollywood treatment in the Christmas release of 47 Ronin. The film is a depiction of the true story of 47 masterless Samurai (ronin) in the 18th century who took revenge for the wrongful death of their master under threat of their own demise by their government if they took action. Director, Carl Rinsch, and Universal Studios have taken the route of turning the story into a mythical fantasy which is sure to anger purists of the true legend.
Kai (Keanu Reeves) is a half-breed (part human, part mystic) who is found by the Asano clan as a boy. He's pretty much treated as a second-class citizen by all the Samurai in the clan with the exception of the clan master who took him in and the master's daughter, Mika, who secretly loves Kai.
The Asano clan has a rival in Lord Kira and his clan who secretly covets the Asano lands and power. And, he's willing to use sorcery to obtain his objective as he has obtained the services of a powerful witch. When the two clans unite for an annual ceremony for the Shogun (governor), an unfortunate event manipulated by Kira's witch forces the Shogun to order the ritual suicide of the Asano clan leader for the offense. Kira is also awarded the Asano lands and the hand of Mika's in one year (to allow the morning of her father). The Asano Samurai, now Ronin, are also ordered to vacate the lands by Kira. Kai is sold into slavery. Oishi, the master's chief lieutenant, is imprisoned by Kira to further humiliate the clan and break his spirit.
Oishi is released a year later and believed to be a broken man. However, he is far from broken. He plans to reunite the Asano Samurai to take vengeance on Kira despite the Shogun's warning a year ago that no vengeance is to be taken. He also needs to liberate Kai as he needs the half-breed's supernatural connection to combat Kira's dark forces.
I went into this movie not knowing the legend of the 47 Ronin. Maybe that's a good thing as I had no preconceived notion of what the story was supposed to be. I admit that I'm a bit of a purist when it comes to characters or stories that I know. The film does make several embellishments on the legend. For example, I'm not completely up on my Japanese history, but I'll take a stab in the dark that dragons and mystical witches didn't exist in 18th century feudal Japan. I'm thinking the liberties that were taken is in part the reason critics have taken a machete to it. But, now knowing the story, I still enjoyed the special effects and embellishments.
That brings me to issue two of why this film has been panned. And, that would be Keanu himself. Come on, now. Insert your Keanu joke here. You know you have one. We all do. And, I'll admit some of those jokes are well earned. But, I also think the actor gets a bit of a bad rap at times. He can be decent, or, at least serviceable in roles that call for an average set of dramatic skills. While I think it would probably be a mistake to cast him in a remake of Raging Bull, he's fine for a role such as this.
I was impressed by the fantasy elements added to the story. It's a fascinating study of loyalty and duty as the 47 Ronin know they face imminent death whether they succeed or fail in their mission. But, honor is paramount in the bushido code and the warriors face their fate with dignity.
47 Ronin won't go down as one my favorite movies of all time, but, I'll be a lone voice in the woods and say it's worth a look. Hurry though. If you want to see it on the big screen, I wouldn't wait too long. Considering the backlash the film is receiving it might be on DVD within the week.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
***1/2 stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
Reviews from the Dark Side presents
The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
Released 12/13/13, now in theaters
Director, Peter Jackson, revisits the fabled, war-torn lands of Middle Earth in the second chapter of The Hobbit series, The Desolation of Smaug. Like the middle chapter of Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy, I thought the action (and brutal slayings) would be amped to 11 for the Hobbit series. In some ways, that is true. In other ways, the pacing of the story is similar to the moderate plotting of An Unexpected Journey which isn't necessarily a bad thing.
The story continues shortly after the events of An Unexpected Journey (and a brief flashback) and finds the ragtag company of Gandalf the Grey (Ian McKellen), the hobbit, Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman), and thirteen dwarves led by would-be king, Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage), on their perilous quest to regain the former jewel of the dwarf kingdom, Erebor. This time the journey takes them the wilds of Mirkwood where the company (minus Gandalf) escapes giant spiders only to be captured by the Wood Elves of King Thranduil. Thranduil makes an offer of freedom to Thorin in exchange for part of the vast treasures contained in Erebor. Thorin, not a huge supporter of elves or of this elf in particular, refuses the offer. It was Thranduil who abandoned the dwarves on the battlefield when they lost their homeland to Smaug years ago.
Meanwhile, Gandalf leaves the group prior to the others entering Mirkwood to pursue a lead of his own. After discovering an ancient graffiti on an ruin at the border of the forest and receiving a telepathic message from the elf, Galadriel (sorry, but you'll have to look her up if you're not familiar), he travels to the tombs of the Nazgul where he finds the deadly Orc, Azog and his army awaiting orders from the mysterious Necromancer who first made his presence known in An Unexpected Journey.
As dangerous as everyone's plight becomes, there's still the small matter of the humongous fire breathing dragon, Smaug (voiced by Benedict Cumberbatch), who claimed the Lonely Mountain in Erebor and all its treasures many years ago. Entering Smaug's lair and retrieving the Arkenstone (a dwarf heirloom) from the most powerful creature on Middle Earth may be a mission none survive.
The Desolation of Smaug features the return (?) of Legolas (Orlando Bloom) to the Peter Jackson madness. Although I'm not sure if you consider this a return since The Hobbit takes place before Lord of the Rings chronologically. But, who cares. The ninja-like elves were the coolest aspects of LOTR. And, their return is a welcome addition to The Hobbit series.
DOS also introduces a new elven character to the mix in Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly), the captain of the Elven Guard at Mirkwood. Apparently, she didn't exist in J.R.R. Tolkein's original story, but she's an asset to the story nevertheless whether she's slaying giant spiders or Orcs. And, she takes out a number of each in spectacular fashion with her deadly bow and blades. She's a great character, but I have to wonder what inspired her existence. Do you think Peter Jackson may have read The Hunger Games trilogy before shooting The Hobbit series? Hmmm.
And I would be remiss if I didn't mention the excellent graphics on the old firebreather himself. A character this grand deserves an amazing presence for his first time onscreen and the special effects team made sure that happened. Impressive would be an understatement to describe the dragon. What made his presence more chilling is tremendous voice work from Cumberbatch who mixes a darkly comic undertone when he first encounters another presence in his lair with sinister menace when he tires of the game he plays with his next "lunch."
Let's not forget that The Hobbit is a prelude to LOTR and there's one little shiny object that continues to rear its ugly head. The One Ring's corrupting influence is seen throughout The Desolation of Smaug as its current owner, Bilbo, loses himself more as he uses its magical power.
As I said earlier, don't expect wall-to-wall action in The Desolation of Smaug. There are a few skirmishes with Orcs throughout, but the smackdown we all want to see comes at the very end. Be patient and you'll be rewarded.
The Desolation of Smaug is basically another setup movie much like An Unexpected Journey. I suspect the nonstop battle scene we've been waiting for will come in 2014's There and Back Again. DOS does provide enough excitement to be worthy of a "must-see" qualification and is easily one of the year's best films.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
**** stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
Released 12/13/13, now in theaters
Director, Peter Jackson, revisits the fabled, war-torn lands of Middle Earth in the second chapter of The Hobbit series, The Desolation of Smaug. Like the middle chapter of Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy, I thought the action (and brutal slayings) would be amped to 11 for the Hobbit series. In some ways, that is true. In other ways, the pacing of the story is similar to the moderate plotting of An Unexpected Journey which isn't necessarily a bad thing.
The story continues shortly after the events of An Unexpected Journey (and a brief flashback) and finds the ragtag company of Gandalf the Grey (Ian McKellen), the hobbit, Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman), and thirteen dwarves led by would-be king, Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage), on their perilous quest to regain the former jewel of the dwarf kingdom, Erebor. This time the journey takes them the wilds of Mirkwood where the company (minus Gandalf) escapes giant spiders only to be captured by the Wood Elves of King Thranduil. Thranduil makes an offer of freedom to Thorin in exchange for part of the vast treasures contained in Erebor. Thorin, not a huge supporter of elves or of this elf in particular, refuses the offer. It was Thranduil who abandoned the dwarves on the battlefield when they lost their homeland to Smaug years ago.
Meanwhile, Gandalf leaves the group prior to the others entering Mirkwood to pursue a lead of his own. After discovering an ancient graffiti on an ruin at the border of the forest and receiving a telepathic message from the elf, Galadriel (sorry, but you'll have to look her up if you're not familiar), he travels to the tombs of the Nazgul where he finds the deadly Orc, Azog and his army awaiting orders from the mysterious Necromancer who first made his presence known in An Unexpected Journey.
As dangerous as everyone's plight becomes, there's still the small matter of the humongous fire breathing dragon, Smaug (voiced by Benedict Cumberbatch), who claimed the Lonely Mountain in Erebor and all its treasures many years ago. Entering Smaug's lair and retrieving the Arkenstone (a dwarf heirloom) from the most powerful creature on Middle Earth may be a mission none survive.
The Desolation of Smaug features the return (?) of Legolas (Orlando Bloom) to the Peter Jackson madness. Although I'm not sure if you consider this a return since The Hobbit takes place before Lord of the Rings chronologically. But, who cares. The ninja-like elves were the coolest aspects of LOTR. And, their return is a welcome addition to The Hobbit series.
DOS also introduces a new elven character to the mix in Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly), the captain of the Elven Guard at Mirkwood. Apparently, she didn't exist in J.R.R. Tolkein's original story, but she's an asset to the story nevertheless whether she's slaying giant spiders or Orcs. And, she takes out a number of each in spectacular fashion with her deadly bow and blades. She's a great character, but I have to wonder what inspired her existence. Do you think Peter Jackson may have read The Hunger Games trilogy before shooting The Hobbit series? Hmmm.
And I would be remiss if I didn't mention the excellent graphics on the old firebreather himself. A character this grand deserves an amazing presence for his first time onscreen and the special effects team made sure that happened. Impressive would be an understatement to describe the dragon. What made his presence more chilling is tremendous voice work from Cumberbatch who mixes a darkly comic undertone when he first encounters another presence in his lair with sinister menace when he tires of the game he plays with his next "lunch."
Let's not forget that The Hobbit is a prelude to LOTR and there's one little shiny object that continues to rear its ugly head. The One Ring's corrupting influence is seen throughout The Desolation of Smaug as its current owner, Bilbo, loses himself more as he uses its magical power.
As I said earlier, don't expect wall-to-wall action in The Desolation of Smaug. There are a few skirmishes with Orcs throughout, but the smackdown we all want to see comes at the very end. Be patient and you'll be rewarded.
The Desolation of Smaug is basically another setup movie much like An Unexpected Journey. I suspect the nonstop battle scene we've been waiting for will come in 2014's There and Back Again. DOS does provide enough excitement to be worthy of a "must-see" qualification and is easily one of the year's best films.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
**** stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
Sunday, December 1, 2013
Gravity
Reviews from the Dark Side presents
Gravity
Released 10/4/13, now in theaters
Sandra Bullock and George Clooney are astronauts who find themselves in one of the scariest life and death situations possible in Gravity, a sci-fi thriller that has gained wide critical approval. The film is directed by the acclaimed Alfonso Cuaron (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban).
Dr. Ryan Stone (Bullock) is a medical engineer on her first space mission aboard the shuttle, Explorer. The expedition is led by veteran astronaut, Matthew Kowalski (Clooney), who is on his last mission before a well-deserved retirement. While working on satellite equipment during a spacewalk, Mission Control (voice of Ed Harris) alerts the Explorer crew to incoming space debris generated from a Russian missile strike on a defunct satellite. The large cloud of high-speed debris hits the shuttle and crew just as the mission is aborted leaving only Stone and Kowalski alive and tethered to each other for dear life. It's a race against time for the pair to reach the nearby International Space Station which has a shuttle they can use to get back to Earth. But, their oxygen is running out and the deadly wave of debris will be back in an estimated 90 minutes.
Check being stranded in space as one of the most horrifying experiences in life along with death by fire and being buried alive. Sandra Bullock's fear is almost palpable as she is tumbling end over end in the deep blackness. And, anyone who is even mildly claustrophobic may be disturbed by the tight spaces she has to squeeze through. Clooney adds a bit of humor as the grizzled veteran trying to keep the crew loose by telling wild personal stories.
The fear caused by the astronauts' plight is diametrically opposed to the grandiose beauty of viewing the Earth from space. As Kowalski eloquently states, "You can't beat the view." Which brings me to how magnificently the film's cinematography. Much thought and effort was placed in Gravity's visuals. Aside from the aforementioned views of Earth, the real-time and slow-motion shots of the debris' path of destruction are nothing short of spectacular. And, there is a scene involving a fiery re-entry into to Earth's atmosphere that is notable as well.
Gravity is also one of the few movies made in 3D whose 3D effects are actually worth paying for. This is what a 3D experience should be. The studio spared no expense to make the effects great and it shows onscreen.
I've done nothing but heap praise on Gravity, so you would think this might be my third five-star review. For all its visual accomplishments, I wasn't doing cartwheels after seeing it. Again, it's visually stunning, but I wasn't particularly moved by the story. It left me flat at times. My reaction to Gravity reminds me of my reaction to another hugely-loved movie, Avatar. The special effects and 3D are the stars and deserve all the credit. Everything else? Not so much.
Please don't misunderstand me. Gravity is a good movie with outstanding special effects. But, as far as anything else is concerned, don't believe the hype.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
***1/2 stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
Gravity
Released 10/4/13, now in theaters
Sandra Bullock and George Clooney are astronauts who find themselves in one of the scariest life and death situations possible in Gravity, a sci-fi thriller that has gained wide critical approval. The film is directed by the acclaimed Alfonso Cuaron (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban).
Dr. Ryan Stone (Bullock) is a medical engineer on her first space mission aboard the shuttle, Explorer. The expedition is led by veteran astronaut, Matthew Kowalski (Clooney), who is on his last mission before a well-deserved retirement. While working on satellite equipment during a spacewalk, Mission Control (voice of Ed Harris) alerts the Explorer crew to incoming space debris generated from a Russian missile strike on a defunct satellite. The large cloud of high-speed debris hits the shuttle and crew just as the mission is aborted leaving only Stone and Kowalski alive and tethered to each other for dear life. It's a race against time for the pair to reach the nearby International Space Station which has a shuttle they can use to get back to Earth. But, their oxygen is running out and the deadly wave of debris will be back in an estimated 90 minutes.
Check being stranded in space as one of the most horrifying experiences in life along with death by fire and being buried alive. Sandra Bullock's fear is almost palpable as she is tumbling end over end in the deep blackness. And, anyone who is even mildly claustrophobic may be disturbed by the tight spaces she has to squeeze through. Clooney adds a bit of humor as the grizzled veteran trying to keep the crew loose by telling wild personal stories.
The fear caused by the astronauts' plight is diametrically opposed to the grandiose beauty of viewing the Earth from space. As Kowalski eloquently states, "You can't beat the view." Which brings me to how magnificently the film's cinematography. Much thought and effort was placed in Gravity's visuals. Aside from the aforementioned views of Earth, the real-time and slow-motion shots of the debris' path of destruction are nothing short of spectacular. And, there is a scene involving a fiery re-entry into to Earth's atmosphere that is notable as well.
Gravity is also one of the few movies made in 3D whose 3D effects are actually worth paying for. This is what a 3D experience should be. The studio spared no expense to make the effects great and it shows onscreen.
I've done nothing but heap praise on Gravity, so you would think this might be my third five-star review. For all its visual accomplishments, I wasn't doing cartwheels after seeing it. Again, it's visually stunning, but I wasn't particularly moved by the story. It left me flat at times. My reaction to Gravity reminds me of my reaction to another hugely-loved movie, Avatar. The special effects and 3D are the stars and deserve all the credit. Everything else? Not so much.
Please don't misunderstand me. Gravity is a good movie with outstanding special effects. But, as far as anything else is concerned, don't believe the hype.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
***1/2 stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
Saturday, November 30, 2013
Homefront
Reviews from the Dark Side presents
Homefront
Released 11/27/13, now in theaters
Jason Statham returns this Thanksgiving week in the action thriller, Homefront. The screenplay was written by Statham's Expendables running buddy, Sylvester Stallone. As a big fan of Statham myself, I was hoping Homefront was at least a return to form for him after the disappointing and achingly boring, Parker, from earlier in the year.
Statham is DEA agent Phil Broker. As the film begins, he's working deep undercover in a motorcycle gang that is getting its feet wet in the crystal meth trade. The mission goes sideways (don't they always) and the leader's son is shot down by police.
Reeling from the experience, Broker resigns from the DEA and lands in his deceased wife's Louisiana hometown to live a quiet life with his young daughter. Small-town bliss isn't meant to be for the Brokers when an unfortunate chain of events is started by daughter, Maddy. She dispatches a school bully using fighting skills taught to her by her father. Matters are made worse when the bully's father and mother confront Phil on the issue and Phil easily takes the father down. Enraged mother, Cassie (Kate Bosworth), then seeks the aid of her brother, "Gator" Bodine (James Franco), local meth cooker and wanna-be gangster. First, Gator sends his hired thugs to teach Phil a lesson. When that quickly goes bad, he breaks into Phil's house and discovers all he needs to know about Phil's past life.
Gator needs a distribution network for his meth. Who better than the motorcycle gang Phil infiltrated on his last mission? And, as incentive for the gang to do business with him, he sends his ex-biker roadie girlfriend, Sheryl (Winona Ryder), to broker a deal with the incarcerated leader who has a score to settle with Phil. She'll trade the agent's location in exchange for the gang's distribution of Gator's drugs.
Homefront represents a return to form for a Statham action movie. This is the good. The dry wit and fast, blinding fight scenes are back. And there are few who can deliver a simple line of underlying menace better than Statham. "Whatever you're thinking, rethink it!", will go down as one of my favorite pieces of dialog in 2013.
The bad is that Homefront is a bit stagnant when Statham isn't busting heads. Statham is easily the most watchable character in the film. Franco does his best "evil hillbilly" impression, but he's just not very scary.
And someone please tell me why characters in movies act like blithering idiots when there is danger? You have Phil's daughter who gives him major attitude when he decides the heat in town is just too much after days of fighting off Gator's thugs. She sees his bruises and cuts. But now that she thinks she's finally made friends, she doesn't want to go? How about when the bullets start flying outside of the house? As Phil is attempting to usher her to the basement to keep her safe, he almost has to physically toss her in as she keeps asking "What's going on?" Did you not hear the bullets outside young Maddy?
Like last year's Taken 2, Homefront is made palatable on the strength of its star. That is, if you're a Statham fan. It's always good seeing him do what he does best. But the film is average if you take him away. It's worth a viewing as a rental, but that's about all.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
*** stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
Homefront
Released 11/27/13, now in theaters
Jason Statham returns this Thanksgiving week in the action thriller, Homefront. The screenplay was written by Statham's Expendables running buddy, Sylvester Stallone. As a big fan of Statham myself, I was hoping Homefront was at least a return to form for him after the disappointing and achingly boring, Parker, from earlier in the year.
Statham is DEA agent Phil Broker. As the film begins, he's working deep undercover in a motorcycle gang that is getting its feet wet in the crystal meth trade. The mission goes sideways (don't they always) and the leader's son is shot down by police.
Reeling from the experience, Broker resigns from the DEA and lands in his deceased wife's Louisiana hometown to live a quiet life with his young daughter. Small-town bliss isn't meant to be for the Brokers when an unfortunate chain of events is started by daughter, Maddy. She dispatches a school bully using fighting skills taught to her by her father. Matters are made worse when the bully's father and mother confront Phil on the issue and Phil easily takes the father down. Enraged mother, Cassie (Kate Bosworth), then seeks the aid of her brother, "Gator" Bodine (James Franco), local meth cooker and wanna-be gangster. First, Gator sends his hired thugs to teach Phil a lesson. When that quickly goes bad, he breaks into Phil's house and discovers all he needs to know about Phil's past life.
Gator needs a distribution network for his meth. Who better than the motorcycle gang Phil infiltrated on his last mission? And, as incentive for the gang to do business with him, he sends his ex-biker roadie girlfriend, Sheryl (Winona Ryder), to broker a deal with the incarcerated leader who has a score to settle with Phil. She'll trade the agent's location in exchange for the gang's distribution of Gator's drugs.
Homefront represents a return to form for a Statham action movie. This is the good. The dry wit and fast, blinding fight scenes are back. And there are few who can deliver a simple line of underlying menace better than Statham. "Whatever you're thinking, rethink it!", will go down as one of my favorite pieces of dialog in 2013.
The bad is that Homefront is a bit stagnant when Statham isn't busting heads. Statham is easily the most watchable character in the film. Franco does his best "evil hillbilly" impression, but he's just not very scary.
And someone please tell me why characters in movies act like blithering idiots when there is danger? You have Phil's daughter who gives him major attitude when he decides the heat in town is just too much after days of fighting off Gator's thugs. She sees his bruises and cuts. But now that she thinks she's finally made friends, she doesn't want to go? How about when the bullets start flying outside of the house? As Phil is attempting to usher her to the basement to keep her safe, he almost has to physically toss her in as she keeps asking "What's going on?" Did you not hear the bullets outside young Maddy?
Like last year's Taken 2, Homefront is made palatable on the strength of its star. That is, if you're a Statham fan. It's always good seeing him do what he does best. But the film is average if you take him away. It's worth a viewing as a rental, but that's about all.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
*** stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
Sunday, November 24, 2013
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
Reviews from the Dark Side presents
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
Released 11/22/13, now in theaters
Revolution is the word of the day in this week's The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, the first sequel to 2012's, The Hunger Games. Catching Fire follows the further adventures of reluctant heroine, Katniss Everdeen, as she unknowingly inspires rebellion against the oppressive government of post-apocalyptic, Panem. Most of The Hunger Games returns, including Oscar-winner, Jennifer Lawrence.
The story picks up shortly after the events of the first film and finds the two survivors of the 74th Annual Hunger Games, Katniss and Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson), returned to their home in District 12 for a brief intermission before starting their victory tour through the 12 districts. Before embarking on the tour, Katniss receives a visit from Panem President Snow (Donald Sutherland) who is not at all happy with her actions in the last Hunger Games. There was supposed to be only one winner of this gladiatorial slaughter and Katniss manipulated events so her co-tribute, Peeta, would survive as well. Her manipulation of the Games has been viewed as defiance among the districts and uprisings against Panem have begun. Snow has a proposition for Katniss. She plays the loving girlfriend/fiancée to Peeta during the tour to give the appearance of support for the current regime and make the masses forget about revolution, or all of her friends and family die.
Despite her best, if reluctant, efforts to quell the spirit of defiance, unrest rises in the districts anyway. Unrest which is always put down brutally, many times in front of Katniss who has now become a symbol to the revolutionaries. This presents a problem to President Snow who can't just put Katniss down and make her a martyr. He has to discredit her among the masses before disposing of her. Enter Plutarch Heavensbee (Philip Seymour Hoffman), the new director of the Games who comes up with an ingenious idea for the 75th Hunger Games known as the Quarter Quell. This will be the Third Quarter Quell which will pull its contestants from the pool of living tributes that have won past years' Hunger Games. The thought is that if the general public witnesses their heroine ruthlessly destroying her opponents in the arena, she will be erased as a symbol of the rebellion. So, the "couple" from District 12 once again is thrown into combat with better trained killers than they faced before. But, fortunately for Katniss and Peeta, not all may be what it appears on the surface and they may have allies in unusual places.
I was able to enjoy Catching Fire a little more than I did last year's The Hunger Games . I'm not sure if it's because I cheated and read ahead and now know how this whole thing ends, or, if it's because this film wasn't achingly drawn out, but I found Catching Fire more compelling. I will give credit where it's due to director, Francis Lawrence, for that.
Catching Fire is an unusual, but intriguing amalgam of political intrigue, gladiatorial combat, and media sensationalism. Panem is a bleak place where most of its citizens live a bleak existence (particularly in District 12). Catching Fire also serves as a metaphor for government betrayal as well. The winning tributes are promised a life privilege and luxury after surviving brutal violence only to be thrown back into that violence on a whim. It's a scary and sad situation conjured by a conniving leadership.
The real attraction here, as with the first film, is Jennifer Lawrence. Is there anyone in Hollywood that is on fire (no pun intended) more than she is right now? With an Oscar ,and now, an immensely popular trilogy under her belt, there' little she can do wrong lately. And hers is easily the most watchable character in the series. She has charisma in spades. Most of the other characters feel like props with no discernible personalities. Sure, there is the quirkiness of Stanley Tucci's and Elizabeth Banks' characters. And Haymitch Abernathy (Woody Harrelson) is the closest thing to a well-rounded character outside of Katniss. But many of the characters are pretty much cannon fodder.
The costume designs are beautifully rendered in Catching Fire. The chariot scene featuring our heroes clothing set ablaze is stunning. As impressive as that scene was, it was topped later when Katniss' white dress transforms into the dark likeness of a Mockingjay (a bird) , a symbol of the revolution. Kudos to the costume designer and FX team for such vivid imagination.
Catching Fire improves on the ideas that were started The Hunger Games. While this film is long, little of it feels like wasted motion. I'm on board for the two-part finale coming in 2014-15. That's something I couldn't say after I saw the first movie.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
***1/2 stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
Released 11/22/13, now in theaters
Revolution is the word of the day in this week's The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, the first sequel to 2012's, The Hunger Games. Catching Fire follows the further adventures of reluctant heroine, Katniss Everdeen, as she unknowingly inspires rebellion against the oppressive government of post-apocalyptic, Panem. Most of The Hunger Games returns, including Oscar-winner, Jennifer Lawrence.
The story picks up shortly after the events of the first film and finds the two survivors of the 74th Annual Hunger Games, Katniss and Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson), returned to their home in District 12 for a brief intermission before starting their victory tour through the 12 districts. Before embarking on the tour, Katniss receives a visit from Panem President Snow (Donald Sutherland) who is not at all happy with her actions in the last Hunger Games. There was supposed to be only one winner of this gladiatorial slaughter and Katniss manipulated events so her co-tribute, Peeta, would survive as well. Her manipulation of the Games has been viewed as defiance among the districts and uprisings against Panem have begun. Snow has a proposition for Katniss. She plays the loving girlfriend/fiancée to Peeta during the tour to give the appearance of support for the current regime and make the masses forget about revolution, or all of her friends and family die.
Despite her best, if reluctant, efforts to quell the spirit of defiance, unrest rises in the districts anyway. Unrest which is always put down brutally, many times in front of Katniss who has now become a symbol to the revolutionaries. This presents a problem to President Snow who can't just put Katniss down and make her a martyr. He has to discredit her among the masses before disposing of her. Enter Plutarch Heavensbee (Philip Seymour Hoffman), the new director of the Games who comes up with an ingenious idea for the 75th Hunger Games known as the Quarter Quell. This will be the Third Quarter Quell which will pull its contestants from the pool of living tributes that have won past years' Hunger Games. The thought is that if the general public witnesses their heroine ruthlessly destroying her opponents in the arena, she will be erased as a symbol of the rebellion. So, the "couple" from District 12 once again is thrown into combat with better trained killers than they faced before. But, fortunately for Katniss and Peeta, not all may be what it appears on the surface and they may have allies in unusual places.
I was able to enjoy Catching Fire a little more than I did last year's The Hunger Games . I'm not sure if it's because I cheated and read ahead and now know how this whole thing ends, or, if it's because this film wasn't achingly drawn out, but I found Catching Fire more compelling. I will give credit where it's due to director, Francis Lawrence, for that.
Catching Fire is an unusual, but intriguing amalgam of political intrigue, gladiatorial combat, and media sensationalism. Panem is a bleak place where most of its citizens live a bleak existence (particularly in District 12). Catching Fire also serves as a metaphor for government betrayal as well. The winning tributes are promised a life privilege and luxury after surviving brutal violence only to be thrown back into that violence on a whim. It's a scary and sad situation conjured by a conniving leadership.
The real attraction here, as with the first film, is Jennifer Lawrence. Is there anyone in Hollywood that is on fire (no pun intended) more than she is right now? With an Oscar ,and now, an immensely popular trilogy under her belt, there' little she can do wrong lately. And hers is easily the most watchable character in the series. She has charisma in spades. Most of the other characters feel like props with no discernible personalities. Sure, there is the quirkiness of Stanley Tucci's and Elizabeth Banks' characters. And Haymitch Abernathy (Woody Harrelson) is the closest thing to a well-rounded character outside of Katniss. But many of the characters are pretty much cannon fodder.
The costume designs are beautifully rendered in Catching Fire. The chariot scene featuring our heroes clothing set ablaze is stunning. As impressive as that scene was, it was topped later when Katniss' white dress transforms into the dark likeness of a Mockingjay (a bird) , a symbol of the revolution. Kudos to the costume designer and FX team for such vivid imagination.
Catching Fire improves on the ideas that were started The Hunger Games. While this film is long, little of it feels like wasted motion. I'm on board for the two-part finale coming in 2014-15. That's something I couldn't say after I saw the first movie.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
***1/2 stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
Monday, November 11, 2013
Thor: The Dark World
Reviews from the Dark Side presents
Thor: The Dark World
Released 11/8/13, now in theaters
The Odinson returns this week in the sequel to 2011's, Thor, in Thor: The Dark World. This movie is a continuance of Marvel Films Phase 2 collection following the individual adventures of the Avengers before culminating in the upcoming Avengers sequel in 2015. Chris Hemsworth, Tom Hiddleston, Anthony Hopkins, and Natalie Portman reprise their roles from the first film. Alan Taylor takes over the directing duties from Kenneth Branagh. After the Avengers, Thor was teleported back to his homeland of Asgard and has not been seen since. What world-shattering event could bring him back to Earth (besides lip-locking Jane Foster)?
The scourge of the Asgardian nine realms, The Dark Elves, have returned with their sinister leader, Malekith (Christopher Eccleston). Eons ago, Malekith attempted to plunge the universe into darkness using the ancient power of the Aether, a weapon made of immense ethereal energy. The Dark Elf and his army were defeated by the Asgardians led by Odin's (Anthony Hopkins) father, Bor. Bor contained the Aether within a large stone and placed it in another dimension so it would remain hidden for eternity. Unknown to Bor, Malekith and some of his followers escape into suspended animation until the present day when they are awakened by the Aether's release. It seems Earthwoman, Dr. Jane Foster (Portman) has found the weapon and has inadvertently been infected by it.
Meanwhile, since the events in the Avengers, Thor (Hemsworth) has been in Asgard quelling rebellions within the Asgardian Nine Realms attempting to finally bring peace and harmony to the lands. When Jane found the Aether, she disappeared between realms gaining the attention of the all-seeing Asgardian gatekeeper, Heimdall (Idris Elba), who, in turn, informs Thor. Thor travels back to Earth using the newly reconstructed Bifrost and takes Jane back to Asgard after she accidentally unleashes an unearthly force due to the Aether. Hoping that Odin and the Asgardian healers can help Jane, Thor discovers he has an even larger problem. A rare cosmic alignment of the Nine Realms called the Convergence is approaching. It's Malekith's intention to use the Aether to plunge the realms into eternal darkness during this alignment. All seems hopeless after the Dark Elf, drawn to Jane, surprise attacks Asgard. Thor has to then turn to the last Asgardian he ever thought he would ask for help.
There is something that has bothered me about how Thor has been portrayed on the big screen. I've never understood why the thunder god angle hasn't been played up. He's portrayed more as an Asgardian alien than a Norse God. And, that's disappointing to me. Thor is not Superman. He never has been; he never will be. Thor has always been more sword and sorcery than technological wonder. He's the God of Thunder, an elemental force unto himself. There's not really any science involved here. He's a product of the union between the King of the Norse Gods and Gaea, the Goddess of Earth (you know, Mother Nature). There's actually a reason why he commands the elements. If you don't know the character's comic backstory, there's no movie explanation as to why it always seems to rain when he's around.
Thor: The Dark World felt very Stargate at times to me. Lasers, glowing swords, and spaceships are very nice to look at visually. But, it just doesn't seem very Thor. I always pictured Asgard and the Nine Realms (aside from Earth) in more of a Lord of the Rings setting. I know this is the comic geek in me talking, so, take what I say with a grain of salt if you must.
All of this being said, there is a lot to like about this film, particularly the performances of both Hemsworth and Hiddleston. I've said this previously about Hugh Jackman as Wolverine, and, I believe the same holds true for Chris Hemsworth. He owns this role. He has the look, the charisma, and grace that defines the character. I know that if enough of these movies are made, Hemsworth won't always be Thor. But, his successor will have a tough act to follow.
Tom Hiddleston always seems to play Loki with an evil, menacing glee. And, he lives up to the moniker of "The Trickster" once again. And. like Hemsworth as Thor, Hiddleston is the quintessential Loki, totally untrustworthy and slimy. You never know whose side he is really on. But rest assured, Loki is always on his own side and he'll use anyone and anything to push his agenda.
If you're like me, you were probably hoping for more "hammer time" in 2011's Thor. And, that's exactly what you get in "The Dark World." And isn't that what you really came to see? Don't we all want a large hammer to pound on the ground to make everyone fall down?
If I'm truly honest, the Dark Elves felt slightly like props for Thor to knock down. Oh, they were vicious enough, but you're kind of clueless as to why they want to destroy the universe. If Malekith uses the Aether for this purpose, doesn't he destroy his own people as well? I don't think they were fleshed out as characters very well.
And is it me, or do the human characters feel like they're in the way and slightly unnecessary? Natalie Portman serves a purpose, I suppose, as Thor's love interest (much better chemistry here than with Hayden Christensen). But Kat Dennings, Stellen Skargard and the other Earthlings are annoyances that slow the movie down at times.
I don't deny I have my criticisms, but I will reiterate there is much to like here and I did like this movie despite the misgivings. It's mostly on the strength of Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston. Both are more than worth the price of admission. There are great action sequences as you would expect. There's another Avenger who makes a cameo (sort of). And, of course, there's the obligatory Stan Lee scene. It also has some silly humor to boot. It's a worthy, if not, spectacular addition to Marvel's pantheon of films.
And do I have to tell you to stay through the end credits? It's a Marvel movie. You know there will be a scene or two when the credits role. Thor: The Dark World gives you two, one after the cast credits and one after the final credits. I have two words to describe what's foreshadowed in one of the scenes. Infinity Gauntlet. Don't know what that is? I would recommend grabbing the trade paperback. All I know is that I can't wait for Thanos to show his ugly purple mug again (last seen in the Avengers).
And I have one last note. I saw Thor: The Dark World on an IMAX-type screen in 3D. While it does look magnificent on the large screen, the 3D is nothing special and not worth the money. Another tip from your friendly neighborhood movie critic.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
***1/4 stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
Thor: The Dark World
Released 11/8/13, now in theaters
The Odinson returns this week in the sequel to 2011's, Thor, in Thor: The Dark World. This movie is a continuance of Marvel Films Phase 2 collection following the individual adventures of the Avengers before culminating in the upcoming Avengers sequel in 2015. Chris Hemsworth, Tom Hiddleston, Anthony Hopkins, and Natalie Portman reprise their roles from the first film. Alan Taylor takes over the directing duties from Kenneth Branagh. After the Avengers, Thor was teleported back to his homeland of Asgard and has not been seen since. What world-shattering event could bring him back to Earth (besides lip-locking Jane Foster)?
The scourge of the Asgardian nine realms, The Dark Elves, have returned with their sinister leader, Malekith (Christopher Eccleston). Eons ago, Malekith attempted to plunge the universe into darkness using the ancient power of the Aether, a weapon made of immense ethereal energy. The Dark Elf and his army were defeated by the Asgardians led by Odin's (Anthony Hopkins) father, Bor. Bor contained the Aether within a large stone and placed it in another dimension so it would remain hidden for eternity. Unknown to Bor, Malekith and some of his followers escape into suspended animation until the present day when they are awakened by the Aether's release. It seems Earthwoman, Dr. Jane Foster (Portman) has found the weapon and has inadvertently been infected by it.
Meanwhile, since the events in the Avengers, Thor (Hemsworth) has been in Asgard quelling rebellions within the Asgardian Nine Realms attempting to finally bring peace and harmony to the lands. When Jane found the Aether, she disappeared between realms gaining the attention of the all-seeing Asgardian gatekeeper, Heimdall (Idris Elba), who, in turn, informs Thor. Thor travels back to Earth using the newly reconstructed Bifrost and takes Jane back to Asgard after she accidentally unleashes an unearthly force due to the Aether. Hoping that Odin and the Asgardian healers can help Jane, Thor discovers he has an even larger problem. A rare cosmic alignment of the Nine Realms called the Convergence is approaching. It's Malekith's intention to use the Aether to plunge the realms into eternal darkness during this alignment. All seems hopeless after the Dark Elf, drawn to Jane, surprise attacks Asgard. Thor has to then turn to the last Asgardian he ever thought he would ask for help.
There is something that has bothered me about how Thor has been portrayed on the big screen. I've never understood why the thunder god angle hasn't been played up. He's portrayed more as an Asgardian alien than a Norse God. And, that's disappointing to me. Thor is not Superman. He never has been; he never will be. Thor has always been more sword and sorcery than technological wonder. He's the God of Thunder, an elemental force unto himself. There's not really any science involved here. He's a product of the union between the King of the Norse Gods and Gaea, the Goddess of Earth (you know, Mother Nature). There's actually a reason why he commands the elements. If you don't know the character's comic backstory, there's no movie explanation as to why it always seems to rain when he's around.
Thor: The Dark World felt very Stargate at times to me. Lasers, glowing swords, and spaceships are very nice to look at visually. But, it just doesn't seem very Thor. I always pictured Asgard and the Nine Realms (aside from Earth) in more of a Lord of the Rings setting. I know this is the comic geek in me talking, so, take what I say with a grain of salt if you must.
All of this being said, there is a lot to like about this film, particularly the performances of both Hemsworth and Hiddleston. I've said this previously about Hugh Jackman as Wolverine, and, I believe the same holds true for Chris Hemsworth. He owns this role. He has the look, the charisma, and grace that defines the character. I know that if enough of these movies are made, Hemsworth won't always be Thor. But, his successor will have a tough act to follow.
Tom Hiddleston always seems to play Loki with an evil, menacing glee. And, he lives up to the moniker of "The Trickster" once again. And. like Hemsworth as Thor, Hiddleston is the quintessential Loki, totally untrustworthy and slimy. You never know whose side he is really on. But rest assured, Loki is always on his own side and he'll use anyone and anything to push his agenda.
If you're like me, you were probably hoping for more "hammer time" in 2011's Thor. And, that's exactly what you get in "The Dark World." And isn't that what you really came to see? Don't we all want a large hammer to pound on the ground to make everyone fall down?
If I'm truly honest, the Dark Elves felt slightly like props for Thor to knock down. Oh, they were vicious enough, but you're kind of clueless as to why they want to destroy the universe. If Malekith uses the Aether for this purpose, doesn't he destroy his own people as well? I don't think they were fleshed out as characters very well.
And is it me, or do the human characters feel like they're in the way and slightly unnecessary? Natalie Portman serves a purpose, I suppose, as Thor's love interest (much better chemistry here than with Hayden Christensen). But Kat Dennings, Stellen Skargard and the other Earthlings are annoyances that slow the movie down at times.
I don't deny I have my criticisms, but I will reiterate there is much to like here and I did like this movie despite the misgivings. It's mostly on the strength of Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston. Both are more than worth the price of admission. There are great action sequences as you would expect. There's another Avenger who makes a cameo (sort of). And, of course, there's the obligatory Stan Lee scene. It also has some silly humor to boot. It's a worthy, if not, spectacular addition to Marvel's pantheon of films.
And do I have to tell you to stay through the end credits? It's a Marvel movie. You know there will be a scene or two when the credits role. Thor: The Dark World gives you two, one after the cast credits and one after the final credits. I have two words to describe what's foreshadowed in one of the scenes. Infinity Gauntlet. Don't know what that is? I would recommend grabbing the trade paperback. All I know is that I can't wait for Thanos to show his ugly purple mug again (last seen in the Avengers).
And I have one last note. I saw Thor: The Dark World on an IMAX-type screen in 3D. While it does look magnificent on the large screen, the 3D is nothing special and not worth the money. Another tip from your friendly neighborhood movie critic.
The Dark Lord of the Sith says:
***1/4 stars
Ratings Legend
Zero *= Don't waste your time. Pure dreck! Dreck is too good for this! Blind me please!
1 *= Fuggedaboutit!
2 *= Average, Mediocre, Nothing Special
3 *= Good viewing. Much better than a poke in the eye.
4 *= Great. Could possibly foot the price of a non-Matinee.
5 *= Pure eye candy. Hall of Fame material here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Send Help- We kick off the new year with a Sam Raimi experience. The gross-out horror aficionado brings a tale of survival, isolationism,... -
Companion- Ahhh, new year, a new slate of movies. And we'll start the year off with a quirky darkly comedic thriller. A young woman ... -
Night Swim- Ahhh, a new year and with it brings cinema filled with all sorts of possibilities. We start 2024 with this little Blumhouse h...